Problem set 1 for ASTR 323/423: The Local Universe

Due in class, Wed Jan 23

Individual problems:


(1) Galaxy classification

Get your hand in by going to http://www.galaxyzoo.org.
Read The Science (http://galaxyzoo.org/Project.aspx) and then do the Tutorial and Proceed to the Trial. After you have passed the Trial, classify 15 galaxies and print out the summary you get by clicking the Show My Galaxies tab.

(2) Sandage "The Hubble Atlas of Galaxies" pp 7-26 gives a detailed description of the traditional Hubble classification. Using this as a guide and more galaxy images from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey, this time using the Navigator function (http://cas.sdss.org/astro/en/tools/chart/navi.asp; type in RA and Dec in degrees in the window), decide the Hubble classification of the following galaxies, print out an image to hand in, and write a short paragraph explaining why you chose this classification, and any difficulties you had applying Sandage's rules.

RA=221.546, Dec=-0.223 (Steven J)

RA=145.514, Dec=0.336 (Lucy)

RA=39.849, Dec=1.094 (Meredith)

RA=36.907, Dec=-1.155 (Ethan)

RA=152.1104, Dec=12.3 (Colin)

RA=187.455, Dec=8.0 (Stephen R)

Another galaxy of your choice near the above galaxy. Give RA and Dec and print out an image. (Jen and Lauren; make sure you dont choose the same galaxy)

The person whose name is after each galaxy's coordinates will give a short presentation in class (first 4 on Wed 23rd, rest on Fri 25th) justifying your classification.

(3) Graduate students only, group problem:

There have been many attempts to improve on galaxy classification schemes such as the Hubble classification. As well as other morphological methods, there has been a movement towards developing less subjective, more repeatable methods, and ones which are more closely tied to physical principles. Read the following papers and write a 3-4 page critical review of the alternatives to morphological classification, and which ones you feel are particularly useful in terms of (a) feasibility and repeatability and (b) possible connections to theories of galaxy formation. (I will be grading on quality of writing as well as content.)

Sandage ARAA 43, 581 (2005) puts the case for a purely morphological classification.
Contrast this with Ensellem et al 2007 MNRAS 379, 401
Balogh et al 2004 (ApJ 615, L101)
and Blanton et al 2002 (ApJ 594 186).
Finish with a combined technique by Conselice 2006 (MNRAS 373, 1389).

You can earn extra credit by finding and discussing recent useful articles on this topic.